Why Can't We Be Spuds

For those who don't know, there has been an ongoing controversy about the name of the Washington football team: The Redskins. Columnists and media outlets are refusing to use the name, because it and the logo featuring the head of an Native American in feathered headdress, is offensive to Native Americans. Native Americans have protested, even the Prez has weighed in. The point is well taken, and one which I agree with: no other racial group in this country would be so portrayed. Lots of other teams and organizations with Native American names and logos have changed in response to protests.

Now I do get it that there are millions of dollars tied up in all the ancillary gear that a sports franchise and the league manufactures to sell and the current owner isn't considered to be the nicest of people. And I can even concede the point that the name, nowadays, isn't intended to offend. But we all know which road is paved with good intentions.

During last night's game, Bob Costas, NBC sports commentator and guru, delivered a commentary on the continued offense the team name causes. The team name, in my opinion, needs to go. But then what to replace it with? The best suggestion is in the comments section of this article on the Costa's commentary. Change the logo to the Redskin Potato. I like it! If Green Bay fans can where hats in the shape of a slice of cheese, why can't we be spuds?

The Hogs can give up their dresses and wear potato sacks instead. Smash potatoes could replace French fries as a unique stadium food. Sacking the quarterback would take on a whole new meaning. Instead of stripping the ball from the running back, commentators could say he peeled the football away. Instead of losing a game, we could be mashed by the other team. With a logo change, yesterday's game could have been described as the Cowboys roasting the Redskin Potatoes.